I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
（三）对报案人、控告人、举报人、证人打击报复的；
。业内人士推荐旺商聊官方下载作为进阶阅读
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28
（三）利用虚拟货币、其他网络虚拟财产为他人提供资金流转服务的。
* @param max 数据最大值